H NO: 26 ST: 19 PHASE 1 DHA I
Tel: (051) 5788613 Fax: 5788614
Cell: 0345 5375114
Existing Articles

 Pakistan’s Foreign Policy and Current Challenges : Aug 21, 2017 12:46 PM
Author: Brig Asif Haroon Raja

Pakistan should continue to play a mediatory role in Iran-Saudi ideological rivalry and in Saudi-Qatar tiff to narrow down their differences and also allay the misperceptions of Gulf States on account of Yemen crisis. It will be unwise to call back Gen Raheel and detach Pakistan from 41-member Muslim Alliance.
CPEC should be made use of as a strong magnet by our foreign policy makers to attract as many nations from Central Asia, South Asia, Middle East, Africa and Europe.

Pakistan’s Foreign Policy and Current Challenges Overview Pakistan has, since birth, been faced with one crisis after another. Tense geo-political environment created by hostile India and unfriendly Afghanistan was the motivating factor which impelled our leaders to accord preference to security over developing institutions and strengthening the economy. Security concerns governed our foreign policy. Pakistan joined western pacts mainly to find an umbrella to mitigate its security concerns. But the US never became a trustworthy and sincere ally, as was the case of former Soviet Union with India. The western pacts proved elusive when Pakistan was truncated in 1971. India had been working upon East Bengal since 1948 with the aim of subverting the minds of Bengalis and poisoning their minds against people of West Pakistan through an orchestrated subversion plan. It wanted to disprove Two-Nation theory. India in collusion with former Soviet Union and supported by several other countries hatched the gory plan of dismemberment of Pakistan. After nine months insurgency, Indian military jumped in to cut Pakistan to size and create Bangladesh. Indira Gandhi chortled that Two-Nation theory had been sunk into the Bay of Bengal. In the aftermath of 9/11, another international conspiracy was hatched to dismember Pakistan. This time the conspiracy was much larger in scope and more dangerous in intent. Pakistan was to be befriended and then cut into four quasi states. In this, India is being supported by USA, Afghanistan, Britain, Israel and the West in general. The tools in use are TTP, BLA, BRA, BLF, MQM and segment of media bolstered by foreign paid NGOs and international media. Daesh is the latest group added to their arsenal. The goals are to destabilize, de-Islamize, de-nuclearize and balkanize Pakistan using covert means and psychological operations. Pakistan was made to fight terrorism on its soil, then accused of harboring terrorists in safe havens in FATA and aiding cross border terrorism in Afghanistan, occupied Kashmir and India, and then constantly pressed to do more. The terrorist groups in FATA, Baluchistan were funded, equipped and trained to fight and exhaust Pak security forces. MQM was funded and its militants trained in India to make Karachi lawless. India and Afghanistan were projected as victims of terrorism and Pakistan as an incubator of terrorism. Covert war launched from Afghan soil in 2002 has incurred a loss of 60,000 fatalities, injuries to tens of thousands, destruction of property, $ 118 billion financial loss and immense social trauma. Pakistan has come under foreign debt of $70 billion. The US imposed War on Terror has heightened ethnicity, sectarianism, extremism, provincialism, political instability, economic fragility and moral degeneration of society as a whole. As a result of these frailties, Pakistan which is a nuclear power with robust armed forces that are second to none, has abundant resources and resilient manpower, it has become vulnerable to foreign coercion, manipulation and aggression. Of all the crises faced by Pakistan in its 70 years history, the present one is perhaps the most dangerous, both in terms of its nature and its possible consequences. Without doubt, Pakistan is in the vortex of grave dangers and the country today stands at the cusp of survival and disaster. The Titans that have marked Pakistan as a target are eager to fragment it. Pakistan’s Foreign Policy Having given the background and overall geo-political environment, I shall now discuss the five stages through which Pakistan’s foreign policy has moved forward to confront multiple challenges. Quaid-e-Azam MA Jinnah had spelt out Pakistan’s foreign policy soon after the birth of Pakistan in these words: Our objective should be peace within and peace without. We want to live peacefully and maintain cordial and friendly relations with our immediate neighbors and with world at large. We have no aggressive designs against any one. We stand by the United Nations Charter and will gladly make our contribution to the peace and prosperity of the world. Our foreign policy is one of the friendliness and goodwill towards all the nation of the world. We do not cherish aggressive designs against any country or nation. We believe in the principle of honesty and fair-play in national and international dealings, and are prepared to make our contribution to the promotion of peace and prosperity among the nations of the world. Pakistan will never be found lacking in extending its material and moral support to the oppressed and suppressed peoples of the world and in upholding the principles of the United Nation’s Charter. Pakistan opened diplomatic relations with all the countries of the world except Israel owing to Palestinian dispute. Successive regimes made concerted efforts to normalize relations with India but failed because of unresolved Kashmir dispute and India not reconciling to the existence of Pakistan. In its desire to become the unchallenged big power of South Asia, India whipped up frenzy against all its neighbors. It applied multiple pressures on Pakistan and went to war thrice so as to force Pakistan to accept its hegemony and become its vassal state. Pakistan in search of security and recognition Pakistan started its journey as a non-aligned nation and remained the member of Non Aligned Movement from 1947 till 1954. In the first 15 years of Pakistan’s life, the founding leaders remained deeply engrossed in establishing credentials of Pakistan’s statehood in the face of massive propaganda of India that Pakistan was a monstrosity. It was described as a transient phenomenon and Indian economic wizards had given six months life to Pakistan. International recognition was sought and obtained in those agonizing years. In its formative years, Pakistan attached importance to relations with Muslim countries and championed Muslim causes. Its efforts to build Muslim unity couldn’t make any headway. It cultivated special ties with Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Pakistan joined western pacts Aggressive posturing of India, its expansionist designs and intentions to absorb Kashmir, together with Afghanistan’s enmity, former USSR’s heavy tilt towards India, deepening economic crisis in early 1950s, sense of isolation, and the UN and Commonwealth failing to resolve the Kashmir dispute were some of the reasons which impelled Pakistan to join the US created SEATO and Baghdad Pact/CENTO in 1954/55. Thereon, its foreign policy was governed by the US interests. Pakistan became part of the US defensive arc stretching to Iran and Turkey to contain spread of communism in South Asia and Middle East. Pakistan did so despite the fact that it had no direct clash with USSR, and had to pay a heavy price for it. When Pakistan acted as a conduit in 1971 to bring China closer to USA, it further antagonized Moscow and it decided to teach Pakistan a lesson. Alignment with USA however, helped Pakistan in improving its economy and defence capability phenomenally during the 10-year Ayub’s golden era. Tilt towards China After the Indo-Sino border clash in 1962, in the wake of Moscow, Washington and the West providing arms to India at the cost of disturbing the regional military balance, Ayub Khan started tilting towards China and Russia. This move was seen as an act of defiance by USA and it decided to penalize him. The US discriminatory attitude was discernible in the 1965 War with India when it stopped extending economic and military assistance including supply of spare parts, whereas Russia kept supplying arms to India. It is believed that both ZA Bhutto and Sheikh Mujib were cultivated to trigger agitations in both the wings to bring down Ayub regime and then pave the way for dismemberment of Pakistan in 1971. Southwestern Asian Identity and policy of Bilateralism After the 1971 tragedy, ZA Bhutto scrapped SEATO pact and membership of Commonwealth stating that those had proved worthless. He then tried to carve out Southwest Asian identity so as to draw security from oil rich Arab States. Assistance by Gulf States brought in financial bonanza for Pakistan in 1970s and also gave an opportunity to Pak military to make inroads into GCC States. Saudi Arabia never hesitated to extend financial support to Pakistan in its testing times. Another change in Pakistan’s foreign policy was affected after the Simla agreement in 1972 which led to policy of bilateralism and non-alignment. Ceasefire line in Kashmir was renamed as LoC and Kashmir issue put on the backburner. Afghan war (1980-1989) Pakistan-US relations nosedived when Pakistan under Gen Ziaul Haq was put under sanctions in April 1979 by Carter regime on account of suspicion that it was pursuing nuclear program covertly. However, the Afghan war in 1980s once again made Pakistan a close ally of USA and was bestowed with $3.5 billion assistance and F-16 jets. Pakistan had to face Russo-Afghan-India nexus and Al-Zulfiqar terrorism. The Afghan war brought Pakistan coolness in Pak-Iran relations but brought Afghanistan under Mujahideen very close to Pakistan. Both talked of providing strategic depth to each other. Pakistan’s challenges in Post-cold war era After the breakup of USSR in 1991 and end of Cold War era, Pakistan was faced with multiple foreign policy issues. The US had abandoned Pakistan, imposed sanctions on it under Pressler Amendment and befriended India. The other issue was the fallout effects of Afghan war in the form of Kalashnikov and drug cultures, radicalization of the society and sectarianism fomented by Iran and Saudi Arabia. The other was the armed uprising in occupied Kashmir. And lastly, nuclear explosions by the two arch rivals in May 1998. These challenges made the democratic era weak and uninspiring. Pakistan’s external climbed up. Despite being repeatedly betrayed, Pakistan didn’t deem it fit to diversify its foreign policy and kept its hopes alive to get into the good books of USA. Impact of 9/11 9/11 changed the global politics and Pakistan was once again befriended by USA and made a coalition partner to fight global war on terror as a frontline state. Pakistan once again shifted all its eggs in the basket of USA. Between 2004 and 2008, Indo-Pak relations improved as a result of peace treaty and resumption of dialogue, giving rise to optimism that core disputes will be resolved. Euphoria died down after the Mumbai attacks in November 2008 when India blamed Pakistan. Indo-Pak relations have hit rock bottom after Modi led BJP regime espousing Hindutva came to power in June 2014. Pakistan foreign policy makers are also faced with near hostile Afghanistan, and the changed attitude of the US. Washington has callously whipped Pakistan under its ‘do more’ policy. Its heavy tilt towards India is a matter of anxiety for Pakistan. Iran nurtures grouses on account of Pakistan’s closeness with Saudi Arabia, and for sending Gen Raheel to Riyadh to head 41-member Sunni Muslim States Alliance. Warmth in relationship with GCC States has diluted because of Pakistan not agreeing to send troops to Saudi Arabia to ward off threat from Yemen. Saudi-Qatar tiff is another challenge faced by Pakistan since it cannot afford to take sides. Ongoing fast changing global dynamics and ever growing strategic partnership between USA and India has impelled Pakistan policy makers to revisit foreign policy and suitably modify it to meet the future challenges. Pakistan’s current challenges India has not reconciled to the existence of Pakistan and strives to reduce it to the status of a Satellite State. India is strategic partner of the US, Israel, Afghanistan and is the darling of the west. The trio is pursuing common objective of destroying Pakistan. India is making concerted efforts to destabilize Pakistan through covert war, and encircle Pakistan by consolidating its presence in Afghanistan, Central Asian Republics (CARs), building North-South Corridor linking Mumbai with Bandar Abbas; and connecting Chabahar with Afghanistan-CARs. India is working hard to isolate Pakistan by tarnishing its image and spoiling its relations with Afghanistan, Iran, Gulf States and the US. Kashmir is an internationally recognized dispute but India stubbornly maintains that it is its integral part well knowing that the Kashmiris hate Indians and want freedom at all cost. To keep Pakistan on the defensive and force it to forget Kashmir, India is playing terrorism card, Baluchistan and Sindh cards, and water terrorism to bleed Pakistan. India’s Cold Start doctrine is aimed at offsetting Pakistan’s strategic nuclear doctrine, and executing it at a time when bulk of Pak forces had got pinned down in designated restive areas. Upturn of Pakistan’s sunk economy and its image, control over energy crisis and terrorism coupled with development works and fast progressing CPEC have increased the anxieties of India. To give vent to its frustrations, it is carrying out unprovoked firing across the LoC and working boundary in Kashmir relentlessly. For all practical purposes, Pakistan has fallen from the grace of USA and time is not far when it will be once again be ditched and put under harsh sanctions. Indo-US-Israel agenda of disabling Pakistan’s nuclear program, or as a minimum curtailing its minimum deterrence capability remain unchanged. Afghanistan under Hamid Karzai remained aligned with India and hostile to Pakistan. Afghan Unity government under Ghani-Abdullah is far worse. Pak-Iran relations are frosty and practically, Iran is more close to India and Afghanistan. Pakistan has been deliberately kept politically unstable by making it play the game of ladder and snake so that it remains economically dependent. It was pulled down whenever it grew economically strong. That is why it has been lurching from one crisis to another in its 70 years checkered history. Pakistan can ill-afford political disharmony and disunity at this critical juncture when black clouds are hovering over its horizon. Geo-political realities Pakistan’s geo-political environment is highly turbulent. The threat to its security has heightened after the signing of three Indo-US defence agreements in 2016 and the US openly expressing its enmity against Pakistan and love for India. Pakistan is faced with multiple threats of Indo-US-Afghan covert war, India’s Cold Start Doctrine, the US Af-Pak doctrine, and Hybrid war and all these threats have now become menacing. India is getting unnerved on account of high intensity freedom struggle in occupied Kashmir, which is slipping out of its hands and is endangering the unity of India. India has no other choice except to keep persecuting the Kashmiris ruthlessly, and also keep the LoC on fire. Muslim Pakistan, laced with nuclear/missile power and now getting economically strong due to CPEC is unacceptable to USA, India and Israel. The trio may go to any extent to disrupt CPEC. Pakistan is faced with the threat of two-front war from east and west, inauspicious southwestern backyard, vulnerable seacoast, not so friendly Gulf States, together with internal war and political instability. Pakistan’s viable nuclear cum missile capability deters India from waging an open war. Nuclear factor has compelled India to resort to indirect strategy to weaken Pakistan from within through unrelenting covert war, discredit and isolate it through propaganda and diplomacy, extract its nuclear teeth clandestinely, and then apply the military instrument through Cold Start doctrine. Having tried out all possible means short of war, the only other option left with enemies of Pakistan is to create political chaos and logjam, paralyze the government machinery and then trigger civil war as in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and Syria. Many are suspecting a game plan behind the current political imbroglio. Success of $21 trillion One-Road-One-belt project of China hinges on successful completion of CPEC. In view of China’s ambition to become leading economic power and its heavy economic stakes in CPEC, it is bound to come to the aid of Pakistan whenever its security is threatened. Pakistan is a target and not an ally of USA. Earlier Pakistan gets out of the enchantment of USA, better it will be. Inferences While many developing countries have raced ahead, Pakistan is still struggling and has neither become an Asian tiger or a secure country. Political parties are behaving irresponsibly and are advised to shun politics of agitation and division and promote concept of “Unity in Diversity”. Strong and united home front is the best defence against internal and external challenges. Any expectation of goodwill and empathy from India, Afghanistan under Ghani and USA, which in pursuit of their common objectives have been inflicting tens of thousands of cuts on the body of Pakistan and its people, will be foolhardy. The newly appointed Foreign Minister Khawaja Asif in consultation with the new PM Khaqan Abbasi and Army Chief Gen Qamar Bajwa need to revisit the foreign policy at the earliest to make appropriate changes after correctly identifying friends and foes and accordingly diversifying the policy to meet the upcoming challenges. Foreign policy instead of being defensive, apologetic and reactive, should be infused with dynamism and pro-activeness. The change in foreign policy should not be abrupt, but gradual and orderly without violent fluctuations. The change should be akin to autumn changing into winter, or winter into spring. While maintaining working relationship with USA, Pakistan should draw closer to China, Russia, Central Asia, SCO, and ASEAN. Pakistan should work hard to bring Iran in the loop of China-Russia peace-talks initiative, possibly draw in Turkey and conjointly work to restore peace in war torn Afghanistan. Pakistan must strive to establish a friendly regime in Kabul. Surging Afghan Taliban and not the corrupt and inept unity government in Kabul toeing Indo-US agenda should be kept in the loop. Pakistan should continue to play a mediatory role in Iran-Saudi ideological rivalry and in Saudi-Qatar tiff to narrow down their differences and also allay the misperceptions of Gulf States on account of Yemen crisis. It will be unwise to call back Gen Raheel and detach Pakistan from 41-member Muslim Alliance. CPEC should be made use of as a strong magnet by our foreign policy makers to attract as many nations from Central Asia, South Asia, Middle East, Africa and Europe. Gwadar-Chahbahar economic rivalry should be converted into an opportunity to complement each other’s strength. Kashmir is the jugular vein of Pakistan. Comprehensive and pragmatic Kashmir policy should be devised to keep the cause of Kashmir alive. __________________________________.

Printer Friendly     

Intro Brochure

Latest Articles
A Tribute to Air Marshal Asghar Khan
Author: ACM Kaleem Saadat
Date: Jan 5, 2018 08:08 PM
Christ’s Christmas Message!
Author: Dr Ikram Azam
Date: Dec 28, 2017 05:58 AM
Author: Bakhtiar Hakeem
Date: Dec 25, 2017 01:15 AM
National Integration: Challenges and Opportunities
Author: Mr. M Saeed Khalid
Date: Dec 25, 2017 01:10 AM

Registered as a Trust
Registered at No.4321 Book No.Vol No.140 on pages No.304 to- on Aug 27th 2008 in the Office of Sub-Registrar (II) Rawalpindi

Useful Links
1 5 0 2 2 8 7 0
Click to Download
� 2007 Copy Rights, Thinkers' Forum Pakistan. All Rights Reserved.

Powered by PakCyber