PAKISTANâ€“ what was to be and what it is
Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
Pakistan came into being sixty two years ago. There are not many around who saw it happening. Some alive today though may have been born yet might not have been mature enough to grasp the politics of the time, unless they are today in their late seventies or more. How many of this class are alive today? And of those alive, how many care to correct the wrong, which is like swimming upstream against the tide. Almost all decision makers today in various fields of national life â€“ government, politics, academics, executive, judiciary, business, agriculture, doctors, engineers et al are in their fifties or a few in the sixties. All are from the post partition generation. Their concept and vision of Pakistan is what they were taught and told about it â€“ right or wrong. Their understanding entirely based upon what is written in their text books or what they read in the readily available material like newspapers and magazines. As is always the case the history of a nation suffers from many an inaccuracy in its formative years, not all by design but some by unwitting ignorance and emotions also. The most damaging factor being the writers, who find it hard not to be influenced by the prevailing popular precepts. The writers who in their eagerness to exhibit their knowledge of the most important event of the history â€“ Making of Pakistan â€“ either tend to lose sight of the realities or just in their enthusiasm for a popular percept or misperception write what the ill-informed reader likes to read. Some lack knowledge others moral courage to face the facts, with the result we have a distorted history. I will be dealing with such inaccuracies and distortions in the subsequent parts of the article.
Pre Partitioned Era
The most important and the most commonly held misperception about Pakistan is that it was created for Islam. No, it was not created for Islam. It was created for the Musalmaans of India, for the economic uplift and the betterment of the down trodden Muslims of India. Islam was never in any danger in the pre-partitioned India, as a matter of fact India had many strong and highly influential religious institutions and centres of excellence like Deoband, Breilli, Lucknow and even Qadian, that wielded their influence not only in the undivided India but also in many other parts of the world where the Muslims lived.
I would, therefore, even at the risk of entering a hornetsâ€™ nest feel morally obligated to correct the record for the posterity. Every Zaid, Bakr and Umar at the first opportunity afforded to him harangues at the rhetoric that Pakistan was created to serve Islam. Most people, particularly the post partition generation, some as old as sixty years, and who not only constitute the majority but also are saddled in the decision making seats at most places, not knowing the facts and fed upon such inaccuracies fall an easy prey to it. Pakistan was certainly created in the â€˜nameâ€™ of Islam, but not â€˜forâ€™ Islam. There is a very fine difference between the two and readers must keep it in mind while going through the article. Pakistan was created for the Musalman â€“ the down trodden Musalman of Hindustan. Islam was never in any danger in the pre-partitioned India, nor did it need to be liberated from the Hindus or the British. Islam w as the platform and a potent one too to unite the Muslims of India as a separate nation in the undivided India. The famous two nation theory got its birth because of the Islamic identity of the Muslims of India. The two nation theory so successfully made use of by the Muslim League under Quaid e Azam was not religious in essence but political to muster the Muslims of India under a separate flag. Had Pakistan to be created for Islam, the Islamic parties and ulema would have been in the forefront to support its creation. On the contrary, almost all the religio-political parties, the ulema, the mushaikh and the madaris of the time not only not supported its creation but opposed it, some vehemently too. Did they not want to create a country which was to be created for Islam? Hence, Pakistan was created ONLY for the socio-economic uplift and betterment of the Muslims of the sub continent who needed badly to be liberated from the economic yoke and clutches of the Hindus and other non-Muslims. Iqbal in his letters to Jinnah imploring him to return from England to lead the Muslims of India wrote, â€œ ----- the problem of bread is becoming more and more acute with each passing day ---- --- the question is how to solve the problem of Muslim poverty. ---- --- if you do not come to lead the Muslims they will be deprived of even the two morsels that they eat now. --- etc.â€ The older generation knows that there used to be mostly only one shop in the villages of Punjab, Sindh and NWFP and that belonged to a Hindu or Sikh. The shopkeeper out of respect and awe was called â€˜Shahâ€™, and held most of the land of the villagers in hypothecation against the money lent by him to them. More than 80 percent of the business was in the hands of the non Muslims. Hardly 20 to 25 percent Muslims at best could find government jobs in the army, police and some clerical cadres. Thanks to Sir Syed Ahmed Khan who init iated them in learning English and studying in â€˜Kafirsâ€™â€ schools that we had some men of letters among the Muslims. Most of the Muslim populace was rural, uneducated and living hand to mouth on their paltry agricultural produce. Immediately after the creation of Pakistan and despite enormous hardships, lack of resources and political hostility of India â€“ withholding of Pakistan share of finances etc. - who could ever dream of the kind of opulence, affluence and opportunities bestowed upon the Muslims â€“ employment, industries, mills and factories, banks and financial institutions, shipping and transportation, housing, malls and plazas, cars, air conditioners, refrigerators etc. that Pakistan offered to the Muslims in just a matter of a few decades after its creation?! One has only to look at the plight of the majority of the Indian Muslims to visualise the conditions that the Muslims in Pakistan too would have been in had there been n o Pakistan.
Once Pakistan came into being and not only survived the first few crucial years of political and economic infancy without collapsing that many a financial pundit and political guru had predicted, but also showed signs of future promise, the Ulema e Hind also started having second thoughts about it and took to migrating to Kafir-e-Azamâ€™s Pakistan. Used to the unparallel power of the pulpit mainly derived from the ignorance and superstitions of the poor Muslims of India, they saw the red rag in the form of economically better off, educated, modern, progressive and enlightened Muslims in Pakistan. Something had to be done to retain their hold on the masses. What else better than the iron hold of the religion and religiosity when even the President of Pakistan and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court could neither offer their prayers nor get their children wedded without a mullah presiding over the occasion? Hence, the independent Pakistan h ad to be Islamised to afford the clergy the same power which it enjoyed in the colonial India. A well thought out plan was conceived and the process of Islamisation of Pakistan started, despite the fact that the Quaid had pronounced in unequivocal terms in his famous speech of August 11,1947 on the floor of the Constituent Assembly:
If you change your past and work together in a spirit that everyone of you, no matter to what community he belongs, no matter what relations he had with you in the past, no matter what is his colour, caste or creed, is first, second and last a citizen of this State with equal rights, privileges, and obligations, there will be no end to the progress you will make. I cannot emphasize it too much. We should begin to work in that spirit and in course of time all these angularities of the majority and minority communities, the Hindu community and the Muslim community, because even as regards Muslims you have Pathans, Punjabis, Shias, Sunnis and so on, and among the Hindus you have Brahmins, Vashnavas, Khatris, also Bengalis, Madrasis and so on, will vanish. Indeed if you ask me, this has been the biggest hindrance in the way of India to attain the freedom and independence and but for this we would have been free people long long ago. No power can hold another nation, and spec ially a nation of 400 million souls in subjection; nobody could have conquered you, and even if it had happened, nobody could have continued its hold on you for any length of time, but for this. Therefore, we must learn a lesson from this. You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place or worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed that has nothing to do with the business of the State. ---- Now I think we should keep that in front of us as our ideal and you will find that in course of time Hindus would cease to be Hindus and Muslims would cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense, because that is the personal faith of each individual, but in the political sense as citizens of the State.
Pakistan when came into being was the fifth largest state in the world and the largest Muslim country. This ideally suited the clergy who in collusion with the naÃ¯ve politicians of the time eager to prove their love for Islam also started harping on the tune of making Pakistan the Fortress of Islam. Pakistan Ideology was hijacked by the same people who had opposed its creation. Had Jinnah's ideals been held sacred then his speech of August 11, 1947 should have received the status of our Magna Carta, our spirit and soul as a nation. Sadly, that was not to happen and we went completely in the opposite direction.
The clergy taking measured steps started gradually influencing the young and naÃ¯ve minds. The potent power of the pulpit was used methodically to project the partition as a war between the Kufr and Islam. The human holocaust of the partition and the sufferings of the Muslims of India migrating to Pakistan were lauded as their sacrifice for Islam. The Islamic fervour gained a quick acceptance among the newly liberated Muslims and watching the tide the Constituent Assembly of Pakistan passed the â€˜Objectives Resolutionâ€™ in March, 1949, which was subsequently made a substantive part of the Constitution of Pakistan by the Presidential Order No. 14 of 1985 of General Zia ul Haq. The Resolution apart from having many highly laudable, far reaching and significantly democratic clauses has the following article as well:
Wherein the Muslims shall be enabled to order their lives in the individual and collective spheres in accordance with the teachings and requirements of Islam as set out in the Holy Quran and the Sunnah;
This innocent looking clause has been grossly misconstrued and misinterpreted and has changed the complexion of the type of the constitution and consequently the type of the government that we should have had. The expression â€œMuslims will be enabled to order their lives ----â€œ has been more or less transformed into a diktat that â€œThe Muslim shall order their lives ---â€œ. Though it has been many a time amply clarified that, â€œNo law repugnant to Quraâ€™n and Sunnah will be incorporated by the parliamentâ€, yet it stays short of satisfying the religious ideologues (fundamentalists and obscurantist) who persist that, â€œOnly Quraâ€™n and Sunnah should be implemented in Pakistanâ€. Not only that, on the top of it they also insist that only their interpretation of the Quraâ€™nic injunctions and Sunnah is to be accepted on all discussable matters. They invariably, come up with the argument that Pakistan was created i n the name of Islam and for the enforcement of Islamic Shariah here and they are the only ones to interpret it.
An effort is, therefore, made to analyse the correct perspective for the creation of Pakistan and what kind of Islamic values and socio-economic systems its founding fathers had in mind for it.
As said earlier, Pakistan was NOT created for Islam, but for the Muslims of the Sub-continent. Islam was never in any danger in the pre-partitioned India. As a matter of fact Islam was (and probably still is) in Deoband, Breilley, Lucknow (for the Shia) and Qadian (for Ahmedis). Akora, Okara, Mansoora, Banori Town Karachi, Satellite Town Rawalpindi, Rabwah (Chanab Nagar), not any one of them has been able to achieve the stature of their pre-partitioned alma-maters.
Muslim emancipation needed a social democratic order in India offering equal opportunities to all which was not possible in Brahmanic cast ridden society of India. Iqbal wrote to Jinnah, â€œIt is clear to my mind that if Hinduism accepts social democracy it must necessarily cease to be Hinduismâ€. Iqbal convinced the Quaid that such an emancipation was only possible in a free and separate State or States for the Muslims of India, where they will be free from the Hindu domination in every way.
A socio-political movement had to be launched and Muslims had to be given a separate identity of a nation. The Two Nation theory was born and Islam could only be its platform. In 1941, the Quaid told the students of the Punjab;
â€œCanâ€™t you see that a Muslim, when he converted more than a thousand years ago, according to Hindu religion and philosophy, he became a Malechaa (untouchable) and the Hindus ceased to have anything to do with him socially, religiously and culturally or in any other way? ----- ----- Can you possibly compare this with that nonsensical talk that mere change of faith is no ground for a demand for Pakistan? Canâ€™t you see the fundamental difference?â€
Slogans like â€œPakistanka matlab kia? La ilaha illilahâ€. â€œLay kay rahaingain Pakistan, Butt kay rahega Hindustanâ€, etc. were more to identify Muslimsâ€™ culture and identity as a separate nation demanding a separate home land and to counter the Hinduistic Band-e-Matram of the Akhand Bharat than a demand for an orthodox religious Islamic state.
Had the Pakistan movement any religious overtones, then how could almost all Ulema and Mushaikh oppose it, or call its leaderKafir-e-Azam? It is yet another matter thatmost of them chose to stay behind and did not migrate to the â€˜Land of the Pureâ€™ till after quite some time of its inception, till they found the opportune time to do so?
I do not recollect any of the Muslim League political gatherings, Executive Committee meetings or other functions commencing their proceedings with the recitation from the holy Quraâ€™n or even a Naâ€™at or a Hamd by a Maulvi or Maulana. It was always an appropriate poem of Iqbal, Hali, Hasrat Mohani or Zafar Ali Khan befitting the occasion read out by a political worker. There was no display of religiosity in the religious sense any where during the Pakistan movement and yet the Islam and the Muslim nationhood was its political plank and platform.
Once Pakistan achieved the Quaid in his very first address of 11 August 1947 to the Constituent Assembly said,
â€From here on Hindus will cease to be Hindus and Muslims will cease to be Muslims, not in the religious sense but in the political sense. We are all Pakistanis first and then Muslims and Hindusâ€.
Nothing could be more unambiguous about Quaidâ€™s vision of Pakistan. It wasnâ€™t that he was against Islam in any way. Far from it. He had on the other hand on many an occasion said categorically that Pakistan will be governed in accordance with the injunctions of Islam and Quraâ€™n. Speaking at a broadcast speech from All India Radio Bombay on 13 November 1939, he said:-
â€œAll social regeneration and political freedom must finally depend on something that has a deeper meaning in life. And that, if you will allow me to say so, is Islam and Islamic spirit --- --- In the pursuit of truth and cultivation of beliefs we should be guided by our RATIONAL (capitals mine) interpretation of the Quraâ€™n and our devotion to truth is single minded, we shall in our own measure, achieve our goal.â€
The emphasis was on the rational interpretation of Quraâ€™n (keeping in time & space with it) and not as interpreted by someone totally devoid of the scientific and technological advancement of the present day and the future.
Similarly replying to a correspondentâ€™s question in 1946 at New Delhi, as to what type of constitution Pakistan will have? The Quaid had replied, â€I cannot say as to what type of constitution Pakistan will have, as it is a matter for the future Constituent Assembly of Pakistan to decide, but we have our 1400 year old constitution â€“ the Quraâ€™n with us to draw fromâ€. (Note, â€˜draw fromâ€™)
Now, Quaid was no doubt largely influenced by the thought of Allama Iqbal, who first conceived the idea of separate Muslim state(s) as the only political solution of the tangle in India. Analysing the problems facing Islam in the modern times, he also re-defined the true basis of a resurgent Islam in the modern world. Being an ardent believer in Ijtehad, he gave the dynamic solution to the problem of interpretation of Islam in the present age by observing;
â€œThe teaching of the Quraâ€™n that each generation, guided and unhampered by the work of its predecessors, should be permitted to solve its own problems.â€
And to solve the problems, solutions to which were not clearly defined by Quraâ€™n or Sunnah, Iqbal leans heavily upon Ijma â€“ collective opinion. Ijma not necessarily only by the religious ulema, the scholars and the jurists only but also by the common people, albeitmasters of their subjects and fields. It is simply not possible for an Aalim-e-Deen [mostly a scholar from a madrassa] to be able to interpret and apply the ALL encompassing Quraâ€™nic injunctions to the present day highly developed scientific and technological knowledge. This also obviously refers to the Quraâ€™nic injunction of â€œamruhum shoora bainahumâ€. He thus infers that the modern parliaments and legislatures [advised by the highly learned and capable professionals of their respective fields] can take place of the bodies competent to express the collective will of the people in deciding matters of immediate import.
Quaid, too, like Iqbal believed that Quraâ€™n could be a complete source of inspiration for the Muslims to help them guide their life according to the true spirit of Islam. However, Quraâ€™n was to be interpreted rationally and scientifically which could only be done by the scholars, jurists and enlightened moderates (not rigid). Quaid distinctly differentiated between an Islamic Social democracy and the Theocracy and stated categorically that Pakistan will not be a theocratic state where the lives of the people could be entrusted to a few â€˜custodiansâ€™ of religion who could impose their own brand of Islam on the masses. Islam to him, as universally accepted, is a complete code of life. A religious, social, moral, military, commercial, judicial, criminal and penal code; it regulates everything from the religious ceremonies and rituals to those of daily life; from the salvation of the soul to the health of the body; from the rights of all those to the duties of all to the individuals; from morality to crime; from punishment here to reward here-after. Islam is not merely confined to few spiritual tenets and doctrines and rituals and ceremonies. It is a complete code regulating the entire Muslim society, every department of life, collectively and individually.
This is all what Pakistan was created for. A country to be ruled in accordance with the Islamic injunctions for the amelioration of the economically and socially down trodden Muslims of pre-partitioned India, and not to save Islam or impose Islam of a specific brand and breed embroiling the masses in the trivialities of rituals overlooking and ignoring the greater humanitarian precepts of social equality and universal brotherhood. Denying women the education or the opportunity of working in an office along with the male workers? Islam is much above such petty matters. And Quaid wanted Islam of all ages, an Islam interpreted in the light of modern, scientific and technological age. An Islam emancipating the masses and opening to them vistas of the modern and fruitful advancement they could make use of and play their important role in the comity of the nations.